Midwest Chick's Place

The CDC published some data about boosters.  One big demographic they left out–the 19-49 age group.  It is likely that they didn’t publish it because the data will show that boosters didn’t do anything (but harm) that age group. (ht again B at Middle of the Right)

Something else they aren’t publishing–child hospitalization rates and comorbidities.  Again, probably because the data won’t match their fear-mongering.

I seem to recall a month or so ago that the CDC was going to put out hospitalization and death numbers breaking out the ‘with covid’ vs ‘of covid’ and that hasn’t happened yet.

It’s pretty clear that they’ve been gaming the numbers from the start.  In Indiana, where they slavishly are licking the boots of the CDC when it comes to number presentation play this trick with age breakdowns for 19 and under:

Percentage of Positive Tests (they call them cases, I refuse to do so) age breakdown:

0-<1

1-4

5-11

12-17

18-19

Percentage of Deaths

0-19

Tested Individuals

0-19

So it is literally impossible to get a handle on the number of deaths by the same age breakdown they use for positive tests.  Or the number of children tested.  And those breakdowns are important considering the vaxxes.

Speaking of vaxxes, they use a whole different age breakdown:

5-11

12-15

16-19

Please note the overlap of data that differs from the positive tests again.  There’s no way to break out 16-17 year olds across the board.

Their breakthrough data doesn’t have any age or demographic data–only a comparison to total vaxxed.

They really have to work hard to try to hide usable data that completely.  And they are following the CDC’s lead.

Crap data = crap decision making and causing fear.  

By design.