(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

I was on this one like stink on shit until I read the details

There is a story in Not the Bee about two Pennsylvania girls who got hauled into criminal court because they were twisting a swing around on a playground and it broke. And the local gendarme charged them with criminal mischief.

Having learned the hard way to read beyond the headlines, I went to the original story. Because I was hot. And there it was…

There were five kids who were playing when the chain broke on the swing. The city charged the parents $59 a piece to fix the damage. Three of the parents paid up to repair the swing.

The fourth parent, didn’t.

Because in a sane world, if your kids break something, even by accident, you pay for it and the situation goes away. But no

Katie demanded more information:

“Show me the evidence my daughters did this on purpose and show me the swing was even inspected prior to this occuring.”

She didn’t pay and so her 10 and 12-year-old daughters were CHARGED WITH A CRIME.

Did the city take the situation to the next stupid level? Yes it did. They could have just taken her to civil court first and not traumatized the girls.

Was the mother a stupid bint who could have avoided this by just paying up? Yep.

Shit happens, accidents happen. Back in the day, there wouldn’t have been a question. You break it, you buy it, accident or no.



7 responses to “I was on this one like stink on shit until I read the details”

  1. Jerrold Kazynski Avatar
    Jerrold Kazynski

    Used to be hymen were covered by that law, also.

    Like

  2. At least mom didn’t use the hormonal defense.

    Like

  3. I want to know the condition of the swing before this happened, and I want to know if the girls or the parents inspected the swing. Of course, that’s meaningless. They may not have the necessary mechanical aptitude to evaluate the swing. It’s in a public park, it should be good. The problem with this story is we don’t know who the jackass is. Is it mom? Or is it the coppers?

    Like

    1. Why choose?

      We live too much in a binary world where we deem one person must be 100% at fault and the other 100% guilty. I disagree. I think it is very possible for both sides to be idiots. On rare occasion, both sides are innocent, but that seldom happens.

      Like

  4. If your kids break stuff because they are acting stupid, yes you are liable. The taxpayers have already paid for the equipment once. Making a parent pay for damage that is due to careless and unreasonable use is definitely reasonable. Charging a kid with a crime for breaking a chain on a swing is absurd to the maximum regardless of any action or inaction on the part of the parent. If the city wanted to make their point- bill the parent and the turn it over to collections if they don’t pay. This whole idea of charging kids with crimes for minor violations is retarded.

    Like

  5. I think if it was my kid- I would be inclined to just send the parks department a piece of chain.

    Like

  6. I get the whole, ‘you break, you buy it,” but they still haven’t allowed the mom to see the surveillance video that proves her daughters were there and involved.
    1st question – why is there surveillance video in the first place?
    2nd question – why won’t they allow the mom to view it?
    3rd question – who amongst us never twisted the swing chains around and then rode the swing as it untwisted? I can remember doing that even into my teens.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *