Midwest Chick's Place

 A federal judge has finally ruled on the painfully obvious in regards to a lawsuit by some service members.  The judge did rule that the DoD cannot mandate shots that are under EUA, but did not put an injunction into place.  But a lot of interesting information was brought to light in this lawsuit.

To give some context to the below, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that there are two Pfizer shots–one is FDA approved and is called Comirnaty and the other is not FDA approved and is still under EUA.

The media, FDA, and CDC have been referring to these two items interchangeably.  With reason because:

EUAs end when there is an approved product.  This hasn’t happened because the FDA is playing fast and loose with the ‘same yet different statements’ that they have made about Pfizer Biotech and Pfizer Comirnaty:

“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

We know the 5-11 version of the Pfizer shot for children has a different formulation and isn’t just a watered down version of the adult shot. 

The approved Pfizer shot (Comirnaty) and the EUA Pfizer shot have different package inserts (actually there’s no package insert for the EUA shot)… 

Pfizer et al have liability protection under EUAs only.  The approved Comirnaty product is not available in the US because once it is, then the EUA by law ends (although the FDA is trying to dodge that bit as well with this statement from their fact sheet.)

“This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and COMIRNATY will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed.”

Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject.

The FDA pulled a fast one and have gotten away with it.  How many millions of people were forced into getting one of the three clot shots by illegal employer mandates?