(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

No shit, Sherlock… dumbassery from Bill Gates

 One of the dumbest things I’ve heard lately (okay, today–there’s a lot of stupid out there) is something from creepy Bill Gates.  He was talking about the utter failure of the covid shots to perform as promised.  Maybe because the data was rigged and dirty in their ‘trials’.

Anyhooo… Bill says:

…”We didn’t have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmission. We need a new way of doing the vaccines.”

Thus showing he’s a dumbass.  What we need is to go back to the original definition of a vaccine where it keeps you from getting a virus in the first place.  Like measles or rubella.  The CDC and NIH, in conjunction with Merriam-Webster, are getting worn out changing the definition of a vaccine

I wonder when the next definition is going to hit since it’s now pretty well known that the injections really aren’t producing protection from the WuFlu either.
See, what they are calling ‘vaccines’ are really treatments or therapies, and not very efficacious ones at that.



4 responses to “No shit, Sherlock… dumbassery from Bill Gates”

  1. The mRNA “vaccines” were a “wartime” response to a new possibly lethal disease. Not bad for a first try. Now it is clear that the China Cof is an annoyance except for those with comorbidities (e.g. untreated medical conditions) and that the “vaccines” have a relatively small number of lethal side effects and an unknown potential for long-term autoimmune disease. The push for these “vaccines” in employees while exempting the members of the “elite” (Congress, Judiciary) suggests that the “vaccines” are being used as a way to create “openings” for their otherwise unemployable “pets”. No proof, but the push seems a bit excessive for just some scheme to skim off a portion of the proceeds of the vaccination. Then, again, the “skim” might be a cover story for a plan to disable a significant portion of productive Americans. There is, you should notice, no mandate for those on any form of “welfare”.

    Like

  2. Mike-SMO–I said something similar in a conversation the other day. Per a post below, I did notice that welfare recipients are exempt from these mandates.

    Like

  3. The mRNA “vaccines” were a “wartime” response to a new possibly lethal disease. Not bad for a first try. Now it is clear that the China Cof is an annoyance except for those with comorbidities (e.g. untreated medical conditions) and that the “vaccines” have a relatively small number of lethal side effects and an unknown potential for long-term autoimmune disease. The push for these “vaccines” in employees while exempting the members of the “elite” (Congress, Judiciary) suggests that the “vaccines” are being used as a way to create “openings” for their otherwise unemployable “pets”. No proof, but the push seems a bit excessive for just some scheme to skim off a portion of the proceeds of the vaccination. Then, again, the “skim” might be a cover story for a plan to disable a significant portion of productive Americans. There is, you should notice, no mandate for those on any form of “welfare”.

    Like

  4. Mike-SMO–I said something similar in a conversation the other day. Per a post below, I did notice that welfare recipients are exempt from these mandates.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *