(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Even when Ivermectin 2.0 comes out, the Faucinator says you'll still need a shot

We have real world evidence that Ivermectin works.  Look at India.  Look at the low incidence of Wuflu in places like Africa–a Japanese study as well as a study in Nigeria give the credit to Ivermectin

We have a meta-study of clinical trials that say it works (via Middle of the Right).

It works so well that both Pfizer and Merck (the original manufacturer of Ivermectin) are creating their own, patented, expensive versions of it.  ETA:  Correction:  Per B in the comments, the Merck pill is not ivermectin-based but is another RNA based anti-viral.  So a big nope on that for me, but I’m sure Fauci will be all over it.

Despite the fact that ivermectin and its look alikes will prevent hospitalizations and deaths, Fascist Fauci still insists that people get the jab.  His reasoning actually made me laugh:

From the article:

But he also warned that Americans should not wait to be vaccinated because they believe they can take the pill. While the new medicine may decrease a person’s risk, the best way to be protected is avoiding infection, he said.

He is still shouting this lie (not a noble lie) but a pure-D untruth, pants on fire, lie every time he crawls out to bask in the Sunday news rounds and feed his ego. 

The jabs don’t prevent infection.  The jabs don’t prevent transmission (ht B)  The jabs are not even preventing hospitalizations and deaths and actually are probably causing them.  The Fauci-authorized remdesivir treatment is killing people too.  

Of course Fauci has a track record in authorizing treatments that kill people. (Please note that this link is from the Huffington Post….)

I’m guessing that the EUAs will continue for the jabs even when there are alternate drugs and therapeutics available (the FDA will break its own rules).

It’s actually amazing that Pfizer and Merck were able to find a group to do a clinical trial since their trials have to be done with unvaxxed people.



12 responses to “Even when Ivermectin 2.0 comes out, the Faucinator says you'll still need a shot”

  1. Think a lot of people are being misinformed on the the recent releases of Phizer/Merck pill meds releases. Neither are ivermectin based https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243781

    Like

  2. urb81–They both use the same mechanism as Ivermectin. All three are protease inhibitors with other stuff thrown in. If you think there's a significant difference or that it's not a redo to create a new patent so they can charge top dollar, I'd say you need to check your information sources. If they are the same ones saying that Ivermectin doesn't work then you are reading an agenda, not information.

    Like

  3. He's actually half right….The Merc drug is a substitute for cytosine, and damages the replication of the RNA….^^Theoretically^^ only in the virus RNA and not in the host. I'd not take it without LOTS and LOTS of testing for fear that it would damage the replication of cells or the RNA/DNA in a human.The Phizer drug, however is an analogue of Ivermectin, using the exact same mechanism with a slightly different protease inhibitor. Those who call it “Phizermectin” are not too far from the truth.

    Like

  4. B–Thanks! I stand half corrected. I thought they were on the same platform. It's interesting that Fauci would be pushing yet another RNA pill instead of something proven and safer.

    Like

  5. Yes….the new pill that's going to be releasedworks by going after viral DNA. It's what is known as mutagenic. And it won't just go after the DNA in a virus.

    Like

  6. Dan–I've read that book and it doesn't end well–I just imagine people's DNA unraveling. Wondering if Merck made it red on purpose to try to get the rest of us to take it???

    Like

  7. Think a lot of people are being misinformed on the the recent releases of Phizer/Merck pill meds releases. Neither are ivermectin based https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243781

    Like

  8. urb81–They both use the same mechanism as Ivermectin. All three are protease inhibitors with other stuff thrown in. If you think there's a significant difference or that it's not a redo to create a new patent so they can charge top dollar, I'd say you need to check your information sources. If they are the same ones saying that Ivermectin doesn't work then you are reading an agenda, not information.

    Like

  9. He's actually half right….The Merc drug is a substitute for cytosine, and damages the replication of the RNA….^^Theoretically^^ only in the virus RNA and not in the host. I'd not take it without LOTS and LOTS of testing for fear that it would damage the replication of cells or the RNA/DNA in a human.The Phizer drug, however is an analogue of Ivermectin, using the exact same mechanism with a slightly different protease inhibitor. Those who call it “Phizermectin” are not too far from the truth.

    Like

  10. B–Thanks! I stand half corrected. I thought they were on the same platform. It's interesting that Fauci would be pushing yet another RNA pill instead of something proven and safer.

    Like

  11. Yes….the new pill that's going to be releasedworks by going after viral DNA. It's what is known as mutagenic. And it won't just go after the DNA in a virus.

    Like

  12. Dan–I've read that book and it doesn't end well–I just imagine people's DNA unraveling. Wondering if Merck made it red on purpose to try to get the rest of us to take it???

    Like

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *