(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

I'm calling that a huge step backwards

The Lancet, which is supposed to be a medical journal, has now reduced women to ‘bodies with vaginas‘.  I gotta admit, my first thought was ‘yeah, and we have tits too.’

As much as there has been a war on men, especially white heterosexual men, the Progs have been steadily trying to make hetero women disappear as well.  

I mean, I’ve called someone a dick before and I’ve been know to pull the c word out when it really was appros so I have/do use body parts to describe someone, but seriously, a medical journal calling women ‘bodies with vaginas’??  Not even a person with a vagina.  Just a body.  With a vagina.

It’s on a level of the Progs trying to erase an entire culture and its language through the use of the term ‘Latinx’.

Talk about objectification….

I’m thinking that the editors of the Lancet are suffering from a case of cranial/rectal inversion.



6 responses to “I'm calling that a huge step backwards”

  1. When I read it my first thought was of a tag/label on a female corpse in the coroner's basement.

    Like

  2. I watched the John Hurt, Richard Burton version of 1984 last night. It would appear whoever wrote the article in the Lancet took it to heart. The War of the Sexes became the War on the Sexes.Interesting times.

    Like

  3. BobF–Me too. It's just wrong.Gerry–That it is. For a group that's .005% of the population.

    Like

  4. When I read it my first thought was of a tag/label on a female corpse in the coroner's basement.

    Like

  5. I watched the John Hurt, Richard Burton version of 1984 last night. It would appear whoever wrote the article in the Lancet took it to heart. The War of the Sexes became the War on the Sexes.Interesting times.

    Like

  6. BobF–Me too. It's just wrong.Gerry–That it is. For a group that's .005% of the population.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *