So la Feinstein says that she felt ‘patronized‘ by Cruz’ questions yesterday and that he was being ‘arrogant’. But after watching the video again, she was the one being patronizing and arrogant–I think that’s the reasoning behind ‘I’ve been here blahblahblah so many years’ commentary. It’s akin to ‘Look youngster, shut your mouth and mind your elders’.
It’s annoying to me when any female, when clearly bested on an intellectual level, falls back on feelings and emotions rather than being able to go toe-to-toe with someone in a real debate involving facts. But of course I’m talking about a California Dem who really has no argument other than emotional charades.
Suck it up toots–if you want to be in the ring, best bring your intelligence and cogent arguments, if you have any, and leave your propensity to get the vapors at the door. Name calling should have ended in sixth grade.
Midwest Chick's Place 
Leave a Reply