Midwest Chick's Place

Apparently there is one person on the child murderer’s jury who has a different vote from the rest of the jury. And the press and mentally ill women are hitting this person hard by trying to define ‘reasonable doubt’.

ETA: Read more of the asshattery going on. The judge is going to personally interview the holdout juror….

To me, in this case, there is no ‘reasonable doubt’. She did it. She planned it, carried out the plan, and admitted she did it. There is no ‘doubt’, reasonable or otherwise that she did it.

She should be punished accordingly.

But the actions of the judge (why wasn’t the jury sequestered?), the press, and the hoards of mentally ill ‘supporters’ are trying to derail the train of justice where people are, by law, expected to take the evidence into account and come up with a verdict. Nothing else matters.

I hope he holds the line.