(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Iowa ‘Educator’ gets 24 months, but what about everyone else?

This is a follow-up to the illegal who somehow became the superintendent of the Des Moines, Iowa school district.

Ian Roberts, the former superintendent of Des Moines Public Schools, pleaded guilty earlier this year to immigration and weapons charges that prosecutors said stemmed from years of deception about his legal status in the United States. Roberts, who was born in Guyana, is expected to face deportation after serving his sentence.

He wanted probation, the judge, surprisingly, gave him twenty-four months in jail.

Which is long overdue justice. But here’s the thing. Yeah, he lied about his education and his legal status and bought guns that he wasn’t legally able to own, but what about the people who were supposed to vet this guy?

Due to their dereliction and laziness, he was allowed to work around and with children. The school district is suing its search firm:

According to the District’s contract with JG Consulting, the firm’s duties included “advertising, search, recruitment, application and resume review, public domain search, complete reference checks and presentation of qualified candidates.” In addition, JG Consulting would “conduct comprehensive reference calls on each applicant to include the verification of all related employment experiences. JG Consulting will arrange for comprehensive criminal, credit, and background checks to be conducted by a third party. ”

A transcript check would be really easy. The candidate contacts their former schools and has a transcript sent directly to a requestor. That information alone, since he lied about his educational experience, would have red-flagged him. He should have flagged on any criminal check since he had a deportation order.

The school board is also trying to foist its responsibility for due diligence off on their consultants. They should know what’s needed and asked for (and reviewed) everything to find any discrepencies.

All of those board members should resign. But none of them will. And none of them will see the inside of a courtroom.



7 responses to “Iowa ‘Educator’ gets 24 months, but what about everyone else?”

  1. Edited this for brevity–MC: The reason a firm hires a head hunter is to offload the effort and responsibility for doing the vetting. That’s how the board and the district can insulate themselves from the liability. This is unfortunate in this case but respecting this is important to upholding the system of contracts and laws. The search firm should face the consequences without a doubt and hopefully heads do roll over this, perhaps even criminal negligence. But the same principle holds in many situations. You hire a contractor to remodel your kitchen and he suggests or outright hires an electrician. …edited… The school board in this case had they used the district HR might find that a relative or old business partner was favored, maybe even inadvertently. So by using a supposedly indifferent out of town 3rd party who has no connection to the people or place the board can honestly say they had no influence.

    Like

    1. Jerry–I had to edit your novelette. I generally discourage people from posting comments longer than the original post. That said, I get your point, however I am of the mind that the board had the responsibility of due diligence and should have thoroughly reviewed whatever their contractor brought them. And I don’t think they did.

      Like

  2. I’m starting to feel that way about a lot of stuff. All that fraud that’s being reported? Yes, some Somalis (among others) lied and conspired and stole govt (actually, our tax money) funds. But, and here’s the thing, the people paying out that money never checked, never followed up, never questioned it. There’s multiple levels of bureaucracy that needs to be purged. Some firings, but also some prosecutions because I have to believe some of those bureaucrats had to be in on that for it to go on so long.

    All those illegals with CDL’s getting in wrecks and killing people? Start charging the states and the individuals who give out those CDL’s with accessory to murder charges.

    With almost any issue, there are those in charge who helped. They should all be investigated, fired, and occasionally prosecuted for dereliction of duty. Sorry, but about 90% of the govt bureaucracy needs to be shitcanned. Federal and state level.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. As I recall, I could be wrong here, memory being what it is these days, “the board” in this case was all far left women who had nothing but fawning soliloquies to say about this guy because he was “so well educated and well spoken” and was a handsome black man.

    Read into that anything you want.

    Like

  4. The responsibility for vetting rests with EVERYONE reviewing the candidate. The Board should’ve demanded all correspondence and work product from the headhunter. And if they saw that no one ordered certified transcripts from his listed universities, that should’ve been questioned immediately.

    I agree with jail time prior to deportation. It acts as a deterrent to others who think that they can pull off the same thing.

    Like

    1. Quick Googling says there were 4 firearm offenses. The average sentence per offense is 5.5 years (67 months). Sounds like Ian received about 1/10th the sentence that an average person would have received.

      Like

  5. Swept under the rug… no surprise…

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *