Midwest Chick's Place

(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not understanding this dem tactic about the SAVE Act

So all of these dems are coming out and are basically saying that women are too stupid to get their papers in order to be able to vote. And maybe some are in which case, yay, they won’t be voting. ETA: I am a proponent of the repeal of the 19th Amendment. That is not where the country is right now so the rest of my commentary is based on the fact that right now it is in effect.

But I don’t know why they are wailing and crying so much. Having to produce a birth certificate and a court order for a name change has been status quo forever in most states (hint to the dems, even trans people changing their names have to do it). And it’s only when you’re getting your official name change with the government that you have to lug everything around, not at the voting station.

But here’s the kicker, I’m going to posit that most liberal/dem women don’t change their names when they get married (at the most they do that stupid hyphenation thing). It’s mainly conservative women or women who have some sense of history and it’s a sign of respect for your husband and his family. And liberal women have none of those things.

But wait, there’s more.

So honestly the dems would be better off to just shut up and pass it. The ‘damage’ to their side will be negligible, and honestly, any woman on the conservative side who can’t catch a clue shouldn’t be at the ballot box anyway.

Midwest Chick's avatar

Posted by:

Midwest Chick

6 responses to “Not understanding this dem tactic about the SAVE Act”

  1. millerized Avatar
    millerized

    “The ‘damage’ to their side will be negligible, and honestly, any woman on the conservative side who can’t catch a clue shouldn’t be at the ballot box anyway.”
    Yeah…uh…color me with whatever crayon I need to be colored, but I’m of the opinion that none of them should be allowed to vote, regardless of race/religion/color or imagined leaning.
    Hell, for the most part, I’m of the opinion that if you haven’t served your country in some way, shape or form, you shouldn’t have a voice in how it’s run.
    To quote Heinlein as inspiration, Service Guarantees Citizenship.
    Again, crayon of your choosing. I’m good with it either way.

    Like

    Reply
  2. Unferth Avatar
    Unferth

    The damage to honest and legitimate Democratic (sic) votes may be minimal, but maybe they know it will drastically hurt their side to have fair and honest elections. We aren’t privy to how much voter fraud has actually been conducted over the last several election cycles. Every time someone tries to file a lawsuit, it gets tossed on technicalities.

    In my ignorance of how much fraud they routinely commit, I will accept their assessment that SAVE would be devastating to their side.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Nemo Avatar
    Nemo

    “All men are created equal” doesn’t say anything about women and in case we haven’t noticed, men and women are different, at least according to conservatives. Back when the 19th was passed, the distinction between men and woman was clearly understood by ALL of society.

    The 19th amendment and its corresponding laws in other western countries has been the proverbial banana peel on the slippery slope for the downfall of western civilization. It has led to all sorts of crazy shit being introduced into the lexicon, including NOT being able to define what a woman is because we’re not biologists.

    A totally insane statement that could only come from the brain of a woman who thought she was being clever, but revealed her ignorance instead. Then, to top it off, she was approved for the highest court in the land by a body that is 75% comprised of men. Total effg insanity.

    Like

    Reply
  4. transparentd307b35537 Avatar
    transparentd307b35537

    My wife(afflicted with TDS) has a best friend – also a TDS sufferer – who is an MD with an MD husband, who has been posting those Dem-sanctioned things on FB about how married women will be prevented from voting because they don’t have birth certificate, marriage license, etc. I’ll guarantee you that 98% of her circle of friends – if they took their husband’s surname – know exactly where there birth certificates and marriage license are – but they won’t need them, because they all have REAL IDs and US Passports readily at hand, because they are frequent travelers to places outside of the USA.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Gerry Avatar
    Gerry

    “But here’s the kicker, I’m going to posit that most liberal/dem women don’t change their names when they get married (at the most they do that stupid hyphenation thing). ”

    My wife did the stupid hyphenation thing in the 1980’s. She would tell you how much she regrets it now. That’s because in the 2020’s no one under the age of 50 remembers why women did that.

    I laugh.

    Like

    Reply
    1. crazyeighter Avatar
      crazyeighter

      Every time I see the hyphenation-double name thing, I’m reminded of “The Color Purple”, and Shug yelling at her pastor-father: “Look Daddy! I’s married now!”

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Gerry Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *