(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Nuclear Renaissance

ht: B

We all know that nuclear power in the US has been stymied for decades, in a large part (IMO) due to the federal government’s onerous regulations.

But now, thanks to President Trump, it looks like the logjam is finally breaking and with new nuclear power plant designs, we may actually be able to keep up with the demand from AI data centers.

From this article, there are a couple of very cool takeaways on new advances:

One of the biggest focuses of nuclear innovation is the development of small modular reactors (SMRs) which will make nuclear power more scalable and streamlined, lowering up-front development costs. These smaller reactors can be mass-produced offsite in a factory setting and then assembled onsite, avoiding the extremely costly design and permitting process of traditional nuclear plants. Already, two SMR models have been approved for rollout in the United States, and many more are in the pipeline

So Small Modular Reactors are actually taking a page from the modular housing processes. This would actually make quality control immensely easier.

The next is even more exciting:

Meanwhile, Oak Ridge National Laboratory is working on integrating cutting-edge technologies into nuclear plant design for more efficient and effective designs and processes, including 3-D printing and artificial intelligence. The Tennessee-based National Laboratory says it has “successfully developed and validated large-scale, 3D-printed polymer composite forms for casting complex, high-precision concrete structures that would be technically challenging and costly to produce using conventional methods.”

The use of these 3-D printed composite forms can considerably cut down on production times. Typically, the casting of “complex structural components with unique geometries” can take weeks, but with these molds, nuclear projects can cast the parts on-site in a matter of days and with greater precision. The design of the 3-D molds has been tested and validated as part of the construction process for the Hermes Low-Power Demonstration Reactor at Kairos Power’s Oak Ridge campus.

It is about time that nuclear power came to the forefront now that the wind and solar boondoggles have been shown to be the non-environmentally friendly options that they are. And with new technologies like 3-D printing being leveraged, it can bring this country (and others) where we should have been thirty years or more ago.



7 responses to “Nuclear Renaissance”

  1. This is good news,

    – Fission power is the most energy-dense power source available.
    – The environmental impact is negligible compared with all other forms of power generation. No carbon dioxide, no large mining or extraction waste, and less transport of hydrocarbons.
    – With proper construction and training of operators of small reactors, the cost of reactors goes down. And is even safer.
    – The issue of the small amount of nuclear waste generated had a complete technological solution in 1982. The waste is minor compared with coal or wind power or solar.

    Like

  2. Add:

    – Useable fusion power has been 20 years in the future for the past 60 years.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. a nations prosperity and progress is directly tied to its energy generation

    Like

  4. If you really want an eye opener, check out the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR).
    No isotopic seperation required, Thorium is as abundant as Lead (and is present on the moon and Mars), 1/100th the waste, burns leftovers from Uranium reactors, no Trans-Uranic waste. Oh, and no water required and operates at atmospheric pressure.
    We had an operating LFTR at Oak Ridge in the late 60s. Nixon shut it down because you can’t make bombs with it.

    Like

  5. “Add:

    – Useable fusion power has been 20 years in the future for the past 60 years.”

    Just like the quantum leap needed for “green” energy to be useful.

    Like

  6. Smaller reactors make it easier to decentralize power generation. That, in turn, makes it harder for a terrorist attack to wipe out power with just a few coordinated attacks. Thought I read somewhere, sometime, that removing a Single Point of Failure can be a good thing.

    Like

  7. There are already many small nuclear reactors operating safely and efficiently … they are installed in nuclear powered submarines and ships. They are by no means new technology and have a proven and demonstrable safety record. The loss of the USS Scorpion (lost in 1968) and USS Thresher (lost 1963) and the regular monitoring of their resting sites after all this time in a corrosive environment shows no leaking of the radioactive fuel.

    Without wishing to denigrate the skills and training of the crews, if basically young men can operate the reactors safely and reliably, then they can be operated by land based technicians too.

    I recall a “joke” about a natural disaster and the US sending a nuclear powered aircraft carrier to the scene. The French asked what they were going to do? Bomb the place? The US replied that the carrier could power a town of 100,000 people, and provide distilled clean water. All due to the nuclear reactor.

    The political will to start producing such reactors for general use is absent and the so called Green/Environmental movement will tie up the project in the Courts indefinitely so why bother? By the time that civilisation collapses and the greens demand that abundant electricity is made available it will be a bit late …

    Like

Leave a Reply to Phil B Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *