(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Two birds, one stone–Plutonium recycling

On August 25, the Trump administration had a draft plan released that indicated that they were going to release plutonium from dismantled warheads to private firms to recycle it for use in nuclear reactors. (ht: B)

The plutonium would come from a larger stockpile of 34 metric tons, which the U.S. had pledged to dispose of under a 2000 non-proliferation deal with Russia. 

The power industry is set to obtain the plutonium at no or very little cost, but it will be responsible for all costs related to transportation, design, and construction of facilities to process and recycle the plutonium to turn it into fuel for the nuclear power industry, a draft memo cited by Reuters showed. 

So it’s a win-win.

And the concept is already being worked on but using spent fuel from nuclear reactors that’s been in storage for decades.

A $1.68 billion project in Oak Ridge, Tennessee will create more than 800 jobs in the nuclear energy sector.

Oklo, an advanced nuclear technology company, announced with Governor Bill Lee this week their plans to design, build, and operate the “first privately funded fuel recycling facility” in the state

From the Oklo website/news release:

“Fuel is the most important factor in bringing advanced nuclear energy to market,” said Jacob DeWitte, Oklo co-founder and CEO. “By recycling used fuel at scale, we are turning waste into gigawatts, reducing costs, and establishing a secure U.S. supply chain that will support the deployment of clean, reliable, and affordable power. Tennessee is showing the nation that recycling can be done to support new nuclear development and growth.”

The recycling facility will recover usable fuel material from used nuclear fuel and fabricate it into fuel for advanced reactors. This process can reduce waste volumes for more economical, clean, and efficient disposal pathways.

Oklo has completed a licensing project plan for the fuel recycling facility with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and is currently in pre-application engagement with the regulator’s staff. In July, Oklo successfully completed pre-application readiness assessment for Phase 1 of the combined license application for Oklo’s first commercial Aurora powerhouse. The facility in Tennessee is expected to begin producing metal fuel for Aurora powerhouses by the early 2030s, following regulatory review and approvals.

Also a win-win. Pretty sure that once the process is in place, then the warhead plutonium is next up.



15 responses to “Two birds, one stone–Plutonium recycling”

  1. How long before we read of the fuel ending up in the wrong hands?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Steve T–It’s better to get the plutonium recycled for use instead of sitting in spent fuel pools all over the US.

      Like

  2. This is essentially what the French have been doing for over 30 years. Making “MOX”—Mixed Oxide” fuel.

    It is radioactive but cannot (without further processing) be used as fuel for a nuclear weapon.
    It’s about the best way to recycle and de-volume spent fuel.

    Like

  3. B
    I thought that the Japanese recycled nuke waste efficiently as well.

    Like

  4. B–Thanks for that information! It’s good that the MOX process takes radioactive waste out of the potential weapons stream (didn’t know that). It’s much better to recycle than try to bury it or store it forever. Yucca Mountain was never a viable option nor is keeping spent fuel stored all over the place.

    Matthew–Japan sends their nuclear waste to France, if I’m not mistaken.

    Like

  5. Thank goodness enough time has passed that the sheeple have largely ceased their ignorant knee-jerk aversion to nuclear energy, which stemmed from a few isolated, preventable disasters (Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, etc.)

    Bless the skittish sheep’s short attention span. (Just don’t remind them about Fukushima.)

    Like

  6. Added comment.
    I agree, better used than just stored.

    But given that weapons grade Plutonium-238/9 half- life.
    It would make a long life Dirty Bomb for a major metro traffic area.
    So I would hope NEST is involved start to install finish.

    BTW:
    Some might remember the early 1980’s incident where a old isotope type Mexican Dental X-ray system was “accidentally” recycled and ended up and dozens of US construction sites rebar that was installed.
    That had to be torn out.

    Like

  7. Harbinger,

    Most, if not almost all, anti-nuke sentiment in the US was and is, sadly, connected to, and it’s not a conspiracy, the KGB and the Soviets in general.

    They funded most of our ‘peace’ organizations and movements, from nuclear protests to Students for a Democratic Society to The Weathermen.

    The gift that keeps on giving. We should be up to 7th gen nuke plants but our plants are still 2nd and 3rd gen.

    Like

  8. Harbinger–Agreed. I’d add comic books to that because of the gamma rays/mutations. Love Stan Lee, but I think he did a lot of damage.

    SteveT–NEST is for emergencies, not for this. Plus the last thing we need is another federal agency poking in. And once the stuff is recycled, the plutonium isn’t an issue. The issue you’re referring to was Co-60, which is a gamma emitter. PU 238 is an alpha emitter–real easy to shield.

    Like

  9. Matthew–Interesting thought.

    Beans–Yep. We should be a lot further along. It was one of the original propaganda ‘successes’ by the KGB.

    Like

  10. Steve T: Plutonium is LESS dangerous than Uranium or most other radioactive metals or transuranics. WAY less dangerous than “Standard” spent nuclear fuel.

    I don’t get your fear of this vs other radioactives…..From your comments, perhaps you need to educate yourself a bit so that your unreasonable fears could be alleviated?

    I can point you to sources for this is you need some. Feel free to contact our hostess and she can give me your email or give you mine.

    Like

  11. B–Thanks for that–your explanations are a lot better than mine. SteveT–I am happy to facilitate an email exchange. Radiation is, for me, actually easier to deal with than chemicals.

    Like

  12. I stand corrected on some points.
    Not NEST now – > Office of Secure Transportation (OST) also under the DOE/DOD.

    It’s been some years, to say the least, since I worked (1979-1980) at the Savannah River Plant (SRP) K & L areas. Where plutonium and tritium materials were handled.

    I had 2 older family members who worked there back in early dirty days 1960 to 1968 era. (both died of cancer, 1 Leukemia & 1 Lung / Gastro).

    While I briefly worked the K & L areas. My position there did NOT deal with rad materials directly. But given the area I was cleaning up, I got some minor dust exposures.

    I was certified NDT RT-2, UT-3, LPT -3 & MP-1 at another site.

    Quoting Wiki
    Of these sources, only nine reactor-produced isotopes stand out as being suitable for radiological terror: americium-241, californium-252, caesium-137, cobalt-60, iridium-192, plutonium-238 , polonium-210, radium-226 and strontium-90,

    Yes P238-9 is an Alpha, with an 80 year 1/2 life.
    Yes Alpha particles have a low penetration ability and cannot pass through the skin. But in an air disbursed dirty bomb, they can be very harmful if ingested or inhaled.

    Like

    1. SteveT–If you are quoting from Wiki, there is an issue. I am not sure why you are fixated on the idea of a dirty bomb when we’re talking about recycling spent fuel. By doing so, you’re undermining your own treatise. Yay for you on your Non-Destructive Testing certs and the fact that you spent a whole year at Savannah River.

      Americium 241 is used in smoke detectors. Cesium 137 is used in medical tech, Co-60 for irradiating goods to kills bugs and bacteria, etc. etc. etc.

      Recycling will help PREVENT radiological terror, not perpetuate it. Yeesh.

      Like

Leave a Reply to Matthew W Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *