(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Activists setting policy

A couple of things have hit the news lately that have exposed another point of failure or, probably more accurate, a point of grift and power, between ‘private’ entities and the federal government.

Via Old NFO, the American Bar Association has been removed from essentially choosing which candidates make it through to be nominated into judicial positions. IMO, we’ve been seeing the results of this in the number of judicial actions designed to stymie the Executive branches’ actions.

From the FDA, pharmaceutical companies have been removed from advisory panels.

“While the FDA should be partnering with industry to ensure a user-friendly review process, the scientific evaluation of new products should be independent,” said Commissioner Makary. “Industry employees are welcome to attend FDA advisory committee meetings, along with the rest of the American public, but having industry employees serve as official members of FDA advisory committee members represents a cozy relationship that is concerning to many Americans. In fact, the FDA has a history of being influenced unduly by corporate interests.”

“Public trust in the healthcare-industrial complex is at an all-time low. We need to restore impeccable integrity to the process and avoid potential conflicts of interest,” said Commissioner Makary.

We all know that the American Federation of Teachers affected and wrote CDC policies on school closings even if they are backtracking like cockroaches when the lights come on.

“Thank you again for Friday’s rich discussion about forthcoming CDC guidance and for your openness to the suggestions made by our president, Randi Weingarten, and the AFT,” wrote AFT senior director for health issues Kelly Trautner in a Feb 1 email — which described the union as the CDC’s “thought partner.”

“We were able to review a copy of the draft guidance document over the weekend and were able to provide some initial feedback to several staff this morning about possible ways to strengthen the document,” Trautner continued. “… We believe our experiences on the ground can inform and enrich thinking around what is practicable and prudent in future guidance documents.”

It’s gotten so bad that the Secretary of Health and Human Services, RFK Jr., had to send out a general letter to ‘health care providers’ telling them to disregard the ‘guidance’ from an organization with a very clear agenda (it’s in their name even).

Providers should disregard the “World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People,” Kennedy said.

WPATH’s standards of care were “fraudulent” and “marked *a clear departure from the principles of unbiased, evidence-driven clinical guideline,” Kennedy told health care providers.

In the last case, WPATH bypassed the feds and went straight to the professional organizations and got them on board. Interestingly enough, WPATH’s money leads back to the Pritzkers–as in JB, the governor of Illinois.

In the case of the feds, they invited the ABA and Big Pharma to the table. Maybe to make that revolving door turn more smoothly. Not sure how WPATH got such power.



6 responses to “Activists setting policy”

  1. ” Not sure how WPATH got such power.”

    How did a group of people that is less than 3% of the population get such power is beyond me. The total LGBT bunch (all of them together) are like 3% of the population, yet they have so much influence in our society, in the Media, in government, etc.

    How did they get power way beyond their numbers? Why do we, as a society, listen to them at all?

    Like

  2. Americans believe 20% of the population is in the alphabet space, like they believe the country is 50% black – because commercials say so.

    Like

  3. B–And that’s the mystery. Maybe it’s part of the communist long game and they got into education, and entertainment, and government decades ago–McCarthy wasn’t completely wrong.

    Texas Dan–Right. It’s all skewed.

    Like

  4. It is understanding how a bill is written.

    Congressperson Alan did not write his keynote piece of legislation. Someone on his staff or a committees staff did.
    They got the wording in part or as a whole from some interested party’s liaison or lobbyist. Other organizations got their two cents added.

    I had interactions with two congressmen who had no idea what was in a bill “they” wrote. Their chief of staffs had to explain that yes in fact that was in the bill.

    Like

  5. Bills are like doing forensic analysis on a stool sample. Apparently they have to be passed to find out what’s in them. And in the end, the content turns out to be more or less identical in both cases. Of course, being a a plumber, I recognize a turd immediately on sight, with no further analysis needed.

    Like

  6. The ones who scream the loudest get the power… sigh…

    Like

Leave a Reply to Midwest Chick Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *