Okay, so the New York Times clearly lost the plot years ago. But damn, I guess no matter how low you think ‘journalists’ can go, there’s always another step on the pathway to hell.
In an article about the San Jose State University’s male volleyball player the following was included:
“The NCAA says trans volleyball players are eligible to play if their testosterone level is less than 10 nanomoles per liter — that’s at least four times more than what many experts say is the top of the range for non-transgender women, and in the typical range for adult men.”
Read it again slowly–the article refers to women as ‘non-transgender women’. As if women, XX chromosome, over half of the population, women are a subset of the trans community (not XX chromosome and definitely not anywhere close to half of the population).
Martina Navratilova said it best:
Hey @nytimes
Don’t call us ‘non-transgender women.’
Just stop it
Stop all the offensive terms for us
❌birthing parent
❌uterus haver
❌menstruator
❌vaginal presenting (from the Olympus spa hearing)We are WOMEN! pic.twitter.com/YpMxDXm5cD
— WomenAreReal (@WomenAreReals) November 29, 2024
If there was ever a question that the main stream media is misogynistic and have fully drunk the trans-Koolaid, then it’s put to rest right now. The fact that the article was written by a woman shows how much that generation has been brainwashed, is evident.
Leave a Reply