Sunday Meme Drop
-
The last one for the win. We even gave it a name when I was in research. Take the data you get and multiply it by the Fudge factor to get the results you want. It wasn't called Fudge but by the name of the researcher. Compare to another PHd who's favorite saying was, ” There are no bad results, merely unexpected ones.” It was a lot more fun to work for the second one than the first.
LikeLike
-
Feynmann: when your experiment doesn't agree with the theory, the theory is wrong. Unless, of course, there are thousands of well designed experiments that support the theory. In that case, you're probably an idiot. An unexpected result, if it can be replicated, is an opportunity to learn. If it can't be replicated, you need to get better at designing experiments. Almost all experiments are poorly designed, but spotting the flaw takes real ability.
LikeLike
-
The one about losing a dog made it real dusty in here; it’s the absolute truth. Lost my derpy Lab a couple weeks ago.
LikeLike
-
I had a Controller introduce me to the FNTB and SWAG! Figure Needed To Balance and Standard Wild Ass Guess. The PREVIOUS guy said he relied on RAILCARS – the NUMBERS on the CARS! The FIRST ONE was kidding and was fond of saying that if you're off even ONE CENT it might mean you're off ONE MILLION in ONE Direction and only 999,999.99 off in the OTHER so FIND IT!
LikeLike
-
Step 1: get a job at PfizerStep 2: pilfer cancer cure Step 3: become the most famous and most loved person in human historyEw. Gross. Give me a McMansion and a divorce by 40, please.
LikeLike
-
Gerry–If the data is bad, then the decision making that follows is as well. Unexpected results are better because the data isn't been changed.Anon–Well said and yes!p2–I'm sorry for your loss!SCBen–Yep. Every cent counts!bk–Okay?
LikeLike
-
The last one for the win. We even gave it a name when I was in research. Take the data you get and multiply it by the Fudge factor to get the results you want. It wasn't called Fudge but by the name of the researcher. Compare to another PHd who's favorite saying was, ” There are no bad results, merely unexpected ones.” It was a lot more fun to work for the second one than the first.
LikeLike
-
Feynmann: when your experiment doesn't agree with the theory, the theory is wrong. Unless, of course, there are thousands of well designed experiments that support the theory. In that case, you're probably an idiot. An unexpected result, if it can be replicated, is an opportunity to learn. If it can't be replicated, you need to get better at designing experiments. Almost all experiments are poorly designed, but spotting the flaw takes real ability.
LikeLike
-
The one about losing a dog made it real dusty in here; it’s the absolute truth. Lost my derpy Lab a couple weeks ago.
LikeLike
-
I had a Controller introduce me to the FNTB and SWAG! Figure Needed To Balance and Standard Wild Ass Guess. The PREVIOUS guy said he relied on RAILCARS – the NUMBERS on the CARS! The FIRST ONE was kidding and was fond of saying that if you're off even ONE CENT it might mean you're off ONE MILLION in ONE Direction and only 999,999.99 off in the OTHER so FIND IT!
LikeLike
-
Step 1: get a job at PfizerStep 2: pilfer cancer cure Step 3: become the most famous and most loved person in human historyEw. Gross. Give me a McMansion and a divorce by 40, please.
LikeLike
-
Gerry–If the data is bad, then the decision making that follows is as well. Unexpected results are better because the data isn't been changed.Anon–Well said and yes!p2–I'm sorry for your loss!SCBen–Yep. Every cent counts!bk–Okay?
LikeLike


.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
















Leave a Reply