Midwest Chick's Place

Captain Obvious says: Given that it was an Obama judge that declared banning illegals from possessing firearms is unconstitutional, I strongly suspect the goal is to undermine citizens from owning firearms.

LikeLike

Rich, I believe your right. Generally speaking.

LikeLike

Snort…

LikeLike

Your blog is a true treasure trove of knowledge, and I'm grateful for it. Discover hidden easter eggs and secrets on our Aviator blog.

LikeLike

NFO–They made me laugh.MN Steel–Indeed.Aviator–Thinking you are spam?Al–Folks doing things legally are treated worse than criminals. And I don't think that illegals should be covered by the Constitution, it is meant for citizens.

LikeLike

Captain Ovbious needs a promotion to Major Obvious for the clever obviousness of that remark

LikeLike

Anon–I strongly concur. And the thing is that the constitution applies to citizens, not non-citizens.Rich and Anon (assuming same anon)–Thank you for the witty repartee this morning! Awesome!

LikeLike

Colonel Truth says it won't matter soon enough.

LikeLike

Hang on a second, I thought that Miranda rights warning that US police have to give everyone, including non-citizens, dates from the '60s. So if the 5th & 6th amendment rights apply to non-citizens why not the 2nd? To legally enter your country I must have no criminal record yet I am treated like a convicted felon regarding gun possession. I ask this because I am a Canadian gun owner who is contemplating buying a winter home anywhere it doesn't snow, possibly immigrating permanently after a few years. Since I enjoy going to the range and would like to have the means to defend my house, I have been looking at the Philippines (very hot/humid, can only rent a house, can own guns) and the Dominican Republic (much closer, can buy house, can own guns, carry permit possible, Spanish speaking). If I were allowed to have arms in a southern state, well I can drive there and don't have to learn Spanish.

LikeLike