(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Keeping the public in public library

 A librarian in Maine actually did his job.  And was backed up by the library board.  At issue:  a book that didn’t meet the pro-trans ideology.

‘I want the library to be there for everybody, not just people who share my voting record,’ Boulet said. So he chose to place the book on the shelves, a decision supported by library staff.

 Once the book hit the shelves, the shit started to hit the fan.  At first quietly because it’s Maine.  He was asked to keep the book behind the counter and make it only available upon request.  And the library’s committee voted no to that idea.

He was accosted, accused of hate speech, and told that if a wanna-be trans child read the book and committed suicide it would be on his head.

Not surprisingly, when he reached out to the American Library Association for support, he received no response.

They finally came out with lukewarm support.

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the ALA’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, said the request had sparked debate within the organization.

‘Our position on the book is, it should remain in the collection; it is beneath us to adopt the tools of the censors,’ she said. Months later, Caldwell-Stone ran into Boulet at a conference and apologized.

So it’s refreshing to see librarians staying neutral and putting stuff on the shelves that they might not agree with, but don’t feel like playing at being censorship tin gods. 



  1. Concur….but remember, that ALSO means putting out the stuff that is in favor of this trend.

    Like

  2. My wife works at a public library.They are all mentally ill commies……………..

    Like

  3. Interesting that someone finally stood up and did the right thing!

    Like

  4. …”sparks outcry”, bullshit….. .01% (or less) can't spark anything, nobody cares, get back in the closet

    Like

  5. I am a Library Director in a small Town. While I, personally , disagree with Blue Hills Director our bylaws do not allowing censoring of any type.In the mid 90's we had a parent confront us about a book that their child was allowed to “take-out”. It was inappropriate for that age level. At that time the Board decided to place a colored sticker next to the “card” pocket. If a underage child requested the book. The Library called the parent for permission. This, at that time, was built into our “user” policy.Jump ahead to present time and our board has several teachers which skews our take on policies.

    Like

  6. Anon–That stuff is already there.Matthew–It does seem to be a thing.NFO–Indeed!Anon–Tyranny of the minority.Dan–I removed your comment because it didn't meet my smell test. You went over the line.Alvin–Why would you disagree with the Blue Hills Director and his committee (he didn't do this unilaterally)? A policy is also a policy–the personnel shouldn't be allowed to skew it.

    Like

  7. MWCI, as I said, disagree with the director take. He, I'm sure, went by their policies. I have been on the Board for over 30 years. As a member and chair. The policy that was in place in the 90's has been rescinded. I, as a avid reader, am opposed to censorship. The caveat is, again in my opinion, the same as buying tobacco or alcohol for minors. The policy requested the parent give permission for the child to have the item. Once received we did. I am only one vote on a board of twelve. as a democratic process I follow the majority vote. My second point is/was the teachers, in general, are more permissive in their thoughts. Not always a good thing when dealing with young people. I sense that we, you and I, are going to have to agree to disagree. Thanks for your thoughts.

    Like

  8. Alvin–I misunderstood what you wrote. We're on the same page.

    Like

  9. MWC. Lol kinda thought that after reread everything. Love your blog. Daily read

    Like

  10. Alvin–Definitely! Glad you drop in!

    Like

  11. Concur….but remember, that ALSO means putting out the stuff that is in favor of this trend.

    Like

  12. My wife works at a public library.They are all mentally ill commies……………..

    Like

  13. Interesting that someone finally stood up and did the right thing!

    Like

  14. …”sparks outcry”, bullshit….. .01% (or less) can't spark anything, nobody cares, get back in the closet

    Like

  15. I am a Library Director in a small Town. While I, personally , disagree with Blue Hills Director our bylaws do not allowing censoring of any type.In the mid 90's we had a parent confront us about a book that their child was allowed to “take-out”. It was inappropriate for that age level. At that time the Board decided to place a colored sticker next to the “card” pocket. If a underage child requested the book. The Library called the parent for permission. This, at that time, was built into our “user” policy.Jump ahead to present time and our board has several teachers which skews our take on policies.

    Like

  16. Anon–That stuff is already there.Matthew–It does seem to be a thing.NFO–Indeed!Anon–Tyranny of the minority.Dan–I removed your comment because it didn't meet my smell test. You went over the line.Alvin–Why would you disagree with the Blue Hills Director and his committee (he didn't do this unilaterally)? A policy is also a policy–the personnel shouldn't be allowed to skew it.

    Like

  17. MWCI, as I said, disagree with the director take. He, I'm sure, went by their policies. I have been on the Board for over 30 years. As a member and chair. The policy that was in place in the 90's has been rescinded. I, as a avid reader, am opposed to censorship. The caveat is, again in my opinion, the same as buying tobacco or alcohol for minors. The policy requested the parent give permission for the child to have the item. Once received we did. I am only one vote on a board of twelve. as a democratic process I follow the majority vote. My second point is/was the teachers, in general, are more permissive in their thoughts. Not always a good thing when dealing with young people. I sense that we, you and I, are going to have to agree to disagree. Thanks for your thoughts.

    Like

  18. Alvin–I misunderstood what you wrote. We're on the same page.

    Like

  19. MWC. Lol kinda thought that after reread everything. Love your blog. Daily read

    Like

  20. Alvin–Definitely! Glad you drop in!

    Like

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *