(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Will the Claudine Gay/Harvard situation bring an end to the stranglehold of the Ivys?

 It’s now very clear that Claudine Gay is a plagiarist.  

The four papers that include plagiarized material comprise a sizable portion of Gay’s academic work. Gay, who is Harvard’s 30th president, has authored just 11 peer-reviewed articles.

“If this were a stand-alone instance, it would be reprehensible but perhaps excused as the blunder of someone working hastily,” said Peter Wood, a former associate provost of Boston University, where he helped investigate several cases of suspected plagiarism. “But that excuse vanishes as the examples multiply,” said Wood, who now serves as the director of the National Association of Scholars.

She’s actually submitting ‘updates’ to her dissertation (didn’t even know that was a thing)

She’s also being shown to be a piss-poor scholar.  Because how can you understand work and data that’s not your own?

Two professors – Michael C. Herron, a quantitative social science professor at Dartmouth, and Kenneth W. Shotts, a professor of political economy at Stanford Graduate School of Business – told a 2002 conference of The Society for Political Methodology that she would not share her data or code with them.

‘We were, however, unable to scrutinize Gay’s results because she would not release her dataset to us (personal communication with Claudine Gay, 2002),’ they noted.

The professors said the statistical practice Gay used in her research often leads  ‘logical inconsistencies’.

The Harvard Corporation is taking heat for hiring her in the first place and then more heat for not firing her when it was clear that swift action was needed.  They’re busy running cover for her probably out of some weird idea that it would salvage their reputation as well.

Another professor has called on Massachusetts lawmakers to appoint a government official to the board to represent the public interest. It would fall under a clause in the state constitution that reserves authority over Harvard to the state legislature, the newspaper reported.

A spokeswoman for Gov. Maura Healey told the outlet she is aware of the proposal and is looking forward to reviewing it.

The current members include a former US Commerce Secretary, a former CEO of American Express and the president of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Each member serves a six-year renewable term, and the current members select new ones.

Not much is known about the board, which for centuries has steered the university and made it one of the wealthiest universities in the world from behind closed doors with minimal transparency.

It’s pretty clear that Harvard’s foray into the world of DEI, at least as far as university leadership goes, has been a complete and utter fail.  And it’s shown the world that Harvard isn’t all it’s cracked up to be as well.  It’s put them under a well-deserved microscope.  And it’s about time.

 



  1. Affirmative Action has given blacks and women carte blanche to cheat because “they deserve it”.Our Meritocracy died with the 19th Amendment, but the damage was cemented in history with the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

    Like

  2. A fabricated thesis to tenured professor at Stanford in four years, to the pinnacle job in academia less than 20 years later. An American success story it's not, it's a story of a cultural rot.

    Like

  3. I can not think of anything of worth to come out of Harvard for years. Sloppy scholarship.

    Like

  4. Will the rest of the world finally see how useless and vacuous college education s are today???

    Like

  5. Soft Racism. “We have to set the standards low for women and Blacks because they can't meet the standards White Men can”. DEI today, Affirmative Action 20+ years ago. Same same. Sadly, this sort of thing damages those splendid folks of color and/or gender who could have succeeded (on Merit) in the position, but weren't deemed worthy because of ideologies….And wo, therefore, not being “placed” in that position, could not be controlled…..Worst part is that every single black person, or woman, will be viewed as having been placed rather than earning their positions.

    Like

  6. With the amount of cash coming from the middle east, and some from elsewhere, the ivy league need not worry if the whole country talks bad about them.

    Like

  7. Current board members select future board members… Any self selecting group will eventually devolve into a monoculture of inbred thinking. This is a fundamental problem with universities in general, current professors select future professors. An idealogical litmus test gets applied either unconsciously or overtly. Higher education is past the point of no return. It's time to stop hiring people from these corrupt institutions.

    Like

  8. No but the saga is entertaining as hell, need more popcorn, spit to much out laughing at the low IQ

    Like

  9. Affirmative Action has given blacks and women carte blanche to cheat because “they deserve it”.Our Meritocracy died with the 19th Amendment, but the damage was cemented in history with the Civil Rights Act in 1964.

    Like

  10. A fabricated thesis to tenured professor at Stanford in four years, to the pinnacle job in academia less than 20 years later. An American success story it's not, it's a story of a cultural rot.

    Like

  11. I can not think of anything of worth to come out of Harvard for years. Sloppy scholarship.

    Like

  12. Will the rest of the world finally see how useless and vacuous college education s are today???

    Like

  13. Soft Racism. “We have to set the standards low for women and Blacks because they can't meet the standards White Men can”. DEI today, Affirmative Action 20+ years ago. Same same. Sadly, this sort of thing damages those splendid folks of color and/or gender who could have succeeded (on Merit) in the position, but weren't deemed worthy because of ideologies….And wo, therefore, not being “placed” in that position, could not be controlled…..Worst part is that every single black person, or woman, will be viewed as having been placed rather than earning their positions.

    Like

  14. With the amount of cash coming from the middle east, and some from elsewhere, the ivy league need not worry if the whole country talks bad about them.

    Like

  15. Current board members select future board members… Any self selecting group will eventually devolve into a monoculture of inbred thinking. This is a fundamental problem with universities in general, current professors select future professors. An idealogical litmus test gets applied either unconsciously or overtly. Higher education is past the point of no return. It's time to stop hiring people from these corrupt institutions.

    Like

  16. No but the saga is entertaining as hell, need more popcorn, spit to much out laughing at the low IQ

    Like

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *