(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Transgenders are homophobic

 Getting out the popcorn for this stuff.

The subject of “genital preferences” is the latest debate in the LGBTQ community, with some tweeting that it is “transphobic” when a cisgender person does not want to date or is not attracted to a transgender man or woman. 

But wait, there’s more.  See it’s not just regular men and women getting the transphobic label–it’s gays and lesbians as well because they generally don’t want to date someone who’s playing dress-up either.

 Rosetta said in her interview with Campus Reform that a split in the LGBTQ community might be necessary given that the issues of the transgender and nonbinary communities seem to diverge from those who are lesbian, gay, or bisexual. 

“[T]he split is not a negative but a recognition that we are different so deserve different [organizations] to look after our individual needs,” she writes. 

Rosetta uses terms within the gender binary to describe advocates for gay and lesbian rights, who “fought hard to be able to be out in polite society and will not have the very term used to describe … [l]esbians diluted.”

Martina Navratilova is getting all kinds of flak:

“Omg…a bloke cannot be a lesbian. No matter what they say, no matter how they feel, no matter how much they try to convince us otherwise. A bloke≠ a lesbian,” Navratilova wrote in response to a video created by the U.K. LGBTQ organization Stonewall about the importance of “lesbian visibility.”

This comment was in response to an article in which a bloke dressed as a woman called himself a lesbian.  A gay publication (but is it really?) , LGBTQ Nation was quick to denounce Martina’s statement.

“In misgendering a trans woman and excluding her from the lesbian community, Navratilova is echoing sentiments of so-called ‘trans exclusionary radical feminists’ (TERFs) who see womanhood as an inborn ‘essential’ identity determined by sex assigned at birth — one that can’t be claimed by undergoing medical transition,” an article in the magazine said of her tweet.

It’s kind of funny that they refer to her as a ‘cis lesbian‘ and essentially put her in the same category as they did JK Rowling–that of TERF ( trans exclusionary radical feminists).

It might be that the Alphabet Mafia is going to get truncated again back down to LGB.  



  1. “Rosetta said”.Is it written in Stone?

    Like

  2. the experiment in leftist lunacy is having an exothermic reaction, likely gonna ignite then turn to ashes

    Like

  3. I have set criteria of what I want in a girlfriend(wife). I believe in traditional role models for men and women. That being said, I would not be interested in dating any transited person either originally, biologically male or female at all, no siree! I certainly wouldn't date a lesbian female(have a lesbian sister, psycho-chick personified) It is blowing up in their collective faces, I mean, when you are in make-believe mode, their are no rules, no common language, no sense common or not… Mental illness abounds and draws us into that inescapable maw.

    Like

  4. Chick, see my response to you post…

    Like

  5. Henk–I probably should have put her full name in there.Anon–I think they are reaching flashpoint.Cederq–Exactly. It's interesting to see how it's backfiring on the LGB folks. I have a couple of friends and neither would want to date either a dude dressed as a woman, or, on the flip side, a woman dressed as a dude. They are definitely on the binary side. Cederq–Saw it! Thanks for the link, BTW.

    Like

  6. “…who see womanhood as an inborn ‘essential’ identity determined by sex…”Or, more briefly, reality.–Tennessee Budd

    Like

  7. “Rosetta said”.Is it written in Stone?

    Like

  8. the experiment in leftist lunacy is having an exothermic reaction, likely gonna ignite then turn to ashes

    Like

  9. I have set criteria of what I want in a girlfriend(wife). I believe in traditional role models for men and women. That being said, I would not be interested in dating any transited person either originally, biologically male or female at all, no siree! I certainly wouldn't date a lesbian female(have a lesbian sister, psycho-chick personified) It is blowing up in their collective faces, I mean, when you are in make-believe mode, their are no rules, no common language, no sense common or not… Mental illness abounds and draws us into that inescapable maw.

    Like

  10. Chick, see my response to you post…

    Like

  11. Henk–I probably should have put her full name in there.Anon–I think they are reaching flashpoint.Cederq–Exactly. It's interesting to see how it's backfiring on the LGB folks. I have a couple of friends and neither would want to date either a dude dressed as a woman, or, on the flip side, a woman dressed as a dude. They are definitely on the binary side. Cederq–Saw it! Thanks for the link, BTW.

    Like

  12. “…who see womanhood as an inborn ‘essential’ identity determined by sex…”Or, more briefly, reality.–Tennessee Budd

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *