Let me set a scenario for you:
A thirteen year old child is online. He or she is contacted by an older stranger (adult). The child is asked to play a game and pretend that pizza toppings are code for sexual acts. For example, cheese is kissing and olives are oral sex. And the child is asked to put together a pizza based on these criteria and present it to the adult.
In this scenario, it would be grounds for an investigation and probably arrest for child sexual exploitation, right?
The school district says ‘oops, wrong assignment’ and both the district and the teacher who sent out the assignment are in the clear (for now).
Now I might not be seeing things from an ‘educational’ level, but both of these scenarios seem to be legally actionable to me.
With an increasing push from academe to normalize pedophilia (see here and here), who’s to say that this isn’t child grooming under the auspices of a classroom experience?
We know other grooming is happening when teachers are told to keep issues regarding children from their parents or are ‘encouraged’ to pledge allegiance to the gay pride flag.
And it’s things like this that demand transparency from schools regarding assignments and other child experiences while they are at school.
That’s probably why the teachers unions and teachers themselves are fighting so hard to prevent it.
Midwest Chick's Place 
Leave a Reply