Perhaps part of that can be blamed on the government. The more they pile on regulations, the more staff are needed to handle the reporting.
But I have a sneaking suspicion that the administrative bloat is not among the staff who actually keep the university running.
If one gives a quick glance through higher ed hiring boards, jobs like diversity jobs–which are higher level administration positions, are pretty common. Because higher ed loves lip service.
I know of one small university with close to twenty higher level administrators (Assistant/Associate Provosts and Assistant/Associate VPs)–all earning more than $100,000/year for a student body of less than 3,000 and a yearly deficit for almost a decade of around $10M/year. Gee, wonder how that deficit happened?
In many cases (there are exceptions), higher ed would prefer to ‘invest’ in managers rather that doers or invest in infrastructure that would actually have a direct benefit to their students.
And faculty are running rampant creating their socialist drones rather than thinking humans. Or are trying to normalize deviance.
What they need are administrators with the balls to actually look at what’s being taught and fire the folks that need firing.
It’s a shame.
Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply