(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Administration vs incarceration

The guys at CWBChicago have a breakdown of how ankle monitoring is supposed to function. I have to say IMO, even if it worked, it wouldn’t work. They asked questions regarding the monitoring of the man who set Bethany MaGee on fire on the CTA train. The answers, when not clearly evasive, were frightening.

What are the standard procedures to be followed when any defendant with similar pretrial release conditions fails to be in their assigned residence as required?

Alerts are automatically emailed to the assigned pretrial officer for verification to determine if they are valid curfew violations. If they are valid curfew violations, the assigned officer will prepare a non-compliance report with all alleged violations. The report will be reviewed by a supervisor before being sent to the Assistant State’s Attorney, the assigned defense counsel, and the clerk to be tendered to the judge no later than the next scheduled court date. The ASA will decide whether to file the non-compliance and petition to sanction or revoke pretrial release.

How many court employees are assigned to monitor pretrial EM alerts? How many of those employees were on duty 11/14 at 9 p.m.; 11/17 at 12 p.m.; 11/17 at 9:25 p.m.?

The department uses a layered monitoring model that includes the contracted monitoring center, Home Confinement staff, and pretrial/probation staff. Two separate groups of staff monitor pretrial EM and associated alerts; Home Confinement Unit EM technicians and Pretrial Services post-release supervision staff. There are currently 17 EM technicians and about 120 FTEs in pretrial post-release. The technicians are split across four shifts covering 24 hours. Technicians are responsible for triaging device-related alerts like tampers and communication loss; they do not triage or respond to inclusion zone/curfew alarms, which are emailed directly to the pretrial officer.

On 11/14 at 9 p.m. there were 4 technicians on shift; on 11/17 at 12 p.m. there were 4 technicians on shift; on 11/17 at 9:25 p.m. there were 3 technicians on shift.

The post-release staff supervise all defendants ordered to pretrial supervision, including those on curfew or 24/7 home detention. Each person on EM has an assigned pretrial officer who is responsible for verifying and addressing inclusion zone/curfew alarms through the non-compliance process. These staff work during normal county business hours (M-F, 8 to 4, 8:30 to 4:30, or 9 to 5).

How many defendants are on EM in any form?

As of 11/21/2025, there were 3,191 individuals on EM with the Adult Probation Department.

    There’s more at the link, but let me sum it up:

    If there’s a violation, someone has to write a report that goes to a supervisor for a review that may or may not be sent to the Assistant States Attorney and others, but doesn’t have to be sent until the next scheduled court date for the violator. So it could be months.

    You’ll note that they didn’t address the 120 FTE post-release staffing and concentrated on the techs, who have limited scope. The 120 FTE only work regular city hours. So there is NO ONE on duty when things are most likely to happen to take any action if someone is in violation of their release requirements. And even if they were, the most they could do is write reports. There is nothing in place to get these people into jail.

    As long as city governments go the administrative route instead of keeping people in jail (and as long as judges do not receive any repercussions for releasing dangerous people into the population), then what happened will both continue to happen and will escalate.



    16 responses to “Administration vs incarceration”

    1. Uhhh…. so one of these miscreants goes “off grid”… that does not instantly trigger a BOLO? Why NOT? That’s a simple SOFTWARE issue, is it not?

      Or better yet, it’s a tracking unit that’s highly accurate and can spot when a “client” is in violation… and exactly WHERE they can be “Acquired” by L.E. Why is THAT not a thing?

      This stuff is pretty simple electronic FAFO if you ask me and that’s kind of how I thought it was supposed to function.

      Pardon me for not considering the “B” (Bureaucracy) factor… I just thought about how it would work if _I_ were wearing one of them.

      Like

    2. Yeah, so definitely not like on TV when the cops show up 5 minutes later? Figured as much.

      Like

    3. Effectiveness was not an afterthought, it wasn’t a thought at all.

      Really, it’s an avenue for graft. Important and Connected people contract to provide the monitoring equipment and connect it to the City’s email…

      This means lucrative contracts for said equipment and services. Big Money changes hands.

      It is the Chicago Way.

      Like

      1. Yeah, exactly like Michael Chertoff provided costly backscatter scanning machines to TSA use in airports after 9/11. It was never about improving anything but his bottom line, and was undoubtedly a payoff for large campaign contributions he made.

        Like

    4. It is past the time when these idiot judges be re-introduced to that part of history known as The Whisky Rebellion.

      Like

    5. boneman–That’s the problem. It doesn’t. It triggers a report that may or may not get where it needs to be with a decision train that could take months. I think the public was under the impression that the process worked differently (I know I did).

      Don–Nope. Imagine that….

      B–All unfortunately true and it is Chicago after all.

      Milton–I guess I understand maybe where you are going, but don’t think it’s the most apt analogy. I’m thinking more tar, feathers, and rails.

      Like

    6. Make the ankle monitor with an explosive tied to geofencing. Solved. TQ not provided.

      Liked by 1 person

    7. Oh, give the option to stay in jail, because you know these tech devices aren’t 100%.

      Like

    8. steves6, the blow up thing might be going too far, make it like an electric fence with a taser-like strength as you approach the limit.
      If that doesn’t work then you go to the explosives.

      Like

    9. …and these people doing the “monitoring” are probably making pretty close to 6 figures with a solid gold health and retirement package for sitting on their ass looking at a screen for 8 hours.

      As to the “system design”, whoever came up with that also needs to be tarred, feathered and ridden on a rail. Why even put a monitor on someone if an alert comes through and a patrol isn’t dispatched to corral the escapee?

      Like

    10. I believe this is what they call security theater. We are told it is safe and effective (where have we heard that) and Hollywood convinces the dim witted masses that if T-Bone so much as looks at his ankle monitor funny Crocket and Tubbs will be kicking in his front door ASAP…

      Like

      1. Make hangings ( not) unusual punishment again.

        Like

    11. The actual screen-watchers and the FTEs get paid decently but not 6 figures. But…

      There are no penalties for not reporting. None at all.

      And the pool of workers, like in the police records divisions and in 911 centers, is generally full of people who are related to those ‘in the system’ and funnel information to their friends, relatives and acquaintances. To say the system leaks like a sieve is an understatement.

      At least Chicago actually monitors, supposedly. There are places where the person being monitored has to pay for the monitoring and if it’s not paid then no monitoring happens. And it takes weeks or months for someone to be notified that the monitoree isn’t, in fact, being monitored.

      And to make matters worse, there are judges who, when a defendant gets too many violations, just releases the defendant rather than incarcerating them.

      Tear the system down and restart it. Bring back corporal and capital punishment and tell the Quakers to take back their ‘rehabilitation system.’

      Like

    12. The monitoring system monitors.
      The reporting system reports.
      Everything is working as designed.

      All is well

      Like

    13. So they write a strongly worded letter or report if someone tampers with the device or leaves the area they are restricted to? That will teach them a lesson.

      Why then do we guard jails and prisons and react so quickly?

      So who exactly owns these ankle monitoring companies? Sounds like a scam.

      Like

    14. Public hangings > ankle bracelets.

      Like

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *