(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

CDC is going to review Hep B shots for newborns

And this is a good thing. As government does, they decide to spray and pray instead of look at risk and reward.

And the overall risk to babies from Hep B being transferred to them in the birthing process is almost non-existent.

In the U.S., an estimated 25,000 pregnant women per year — or 0.69% — have HBV. About 1,000 of those women pass the virus to their babies, according to HHS.

There are two physicians suing the CDC over the childhood vaccination schedule which they say is the most aggressive in the world. They lost their jobs (to be more specific, they had their medical licenses pulled) for not advocating for this schedule (toeing the line).

The physicians asked the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. to declare CDC’s vaccine practices unconstitutional, loosen its vaccine requirements for children, and force the agency to do further research on the vaccines, per Bloomberg Law.

“[The vaccine framework] is only based on an evaluation of short-term individual vaccine risks,” the lawsuit reads. “The CDC has never studied the combined effects and the accumulating dangers of administering all of the vaccines on the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccination schedule.”

The doctors also highlighted that vaccine recommendations from the CDC often become state law, even if there’s little cumulative research to back up the recommendations. 

They want this schedule to be declared unconstitutional since CDC ‘recommendations’ are often just slotted into state laws as a matter of course and without the states looking at research.

Ideally, any shots should be up to the parents and doctors based on true risk and reward. The Hep B shot is the perfect example. There were 3,596,017 babies born in the US in 2023. According to the stats above, only 0.69% are possibly exposed to Hep B during childbirth. Only 1000 babies get the virus. That’s 0.028% of all the babies born. But yet all of them get the Hep B shot when all but those 1000 are at risk. And that shot is codified by the states into a requirement for school attendance.

As with all things government, there should be five year sunsets on law and regs and five year reviews of things like this. As a side benefit, this would keep government busy reviewing or having things automatically go off the books if it’s not a priority anymore.

And the histrionic doomsayers are losing their freaking minds over a review of this shot which is clearly not necessary for all children.



4 responses to “CDC is going to review Hep B shots for newborns”

  1. I’m sure the CDC officials do look at risk to reward. There is no risk to them or their careers, and the reward is being hired by big pharma. Recommending a vaccine has nothing but upside to them.

    Like

  2. Just another example of the CDC/NIAID always siding with the drug companies instead of adhering to their mandate which is to protect the public from harm.

    The straw that broke the CDC’s camel, although it was a pretty big straw, was the Kung Flu clot shot. Anyone that was alive during this recent travesty will never trust any .gov agency again.

    I just want to know when any of those effr’s, especially that miserable little weasel Fraudci, are going to jail.

    Seems there are never enough lawyers when you really need some.

    Like

  3. Unferth–Well said and so true.

    Nemo–Yep. It’s because of those kickbacks. But yes, they overstepped with the Wuflu shots. There’s too many lawyers, but it’s the prosecutors that are the problem. If they won’t recommend charges, then they die on the vine.

    Like

  4. Science + politics = politics. Science + “incentives “= corruption.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *