(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

No new windmills

At least during the Trump administration (and hopefully they’ll die forever).

As he correctly points out, windmill parts are not recyclable, are detrimental to animal life, including whales, and are the most expensive form of energy per kilowatt hour produced.

“In all fairness, Germany tried it, and wind doesn’t work,” Trump said. “You need subsidy for wind, and energy should not need subsidy. With energy, you make money, you don’t lose money. But more important than that, it ruins the landscape, it kills the birds, they’re noisy.”

He said that in coastal Massachusetts more whales have washed ashore recently because the windmills are “driving them loco, it’s driving them crazy.”

ETA (ht: B):

The Department of the Interior (DOI) will release five policy updates on Tuesday afternoon to better align the agency with President Donald Trump‘s affordable energy agenda, the Daily Mail has exclusively learned.

Part of that mission is to cut federal funding to renewable wind energy sources like wind turbines on land and off-shore.   

The order seeks to end ‘preferential treatment for unreliable energy sources like wind,’ according to a drafted press release obtained by the Daily Mail.

It also will prompt the DOI to identify policies favoring wind and solar energy and halt spending on ‘energy supply chains controlled by foreign rivals.’ Notably, China leads the globe in turbine and solar power manufacturing.   

The DOI order will also prompt the department to review avian mortality rates caused by wind energy projects in migratory birds’ flight paths

Bird deaths that are caused by legal activities are considered ‘incidental’ under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the DOI will study whether wind turbines qualify for legal protections under the law.

If not, turbine operators could be on the hook for killing birds even if it is unintentional. 

Trump has noted in the past that American bald eagles were being killed by turbines in California. 

Now if we could just get rid of the ones that are already in place….. But if the turbine operators are liable, I can see them coming down pretty quick!



13 responses to “No new windmills”

  1. It will go from massive wind farms to mass graves. All they can do with the blades is bury them. Oh, and what, about 800 gallons of lube oil each? (gear box only)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. No doubt one can recycle lube oil. No doubt one won’t.

    Like

  3. Stop using tax dollars………………..
    Windmills will die on their own………….

    Like

  4. …not to mention the eyesore they create.

    The ridges all around camp are adorned with them. However it’s very rare day when ANY OF THEM are making juice.

    Wild game is finally starting to return to the area ten years after the one on our mountain was installed.

    I once asked one of the locals what she thought of having one overlooking her property. “Better than having a nuke plant there” was her response, as if a nuke plant would be built out in the woods in the middle of east bumf*ck.

    Like

  5. steves6–I’m sure they’ll drain the oil and can maybe do something with it. The blades will just be buried a bit prematurely, but that’s where they were going anyway.

    dearieme–I think/hope they will.

    Matthew–Yep, that’s the other part. No more subsidies for these eyesores.

    Nemo–Obviously someone who doesn’t think about consequences. But is probably complaining about more flies and mosquitos because the bats and birds were being killed by the windmills.

    Like

  6. Do not forget the nice land ruining effect. Who is going to remove all of this from the ground (no one)? I am sure Gai is pleased and the new captain planet reboot will be all for it.

    “The construction of 15 to 20-foot-deep concrete foundations…On average, each of these below-ground support systems used 60 truckloads of concrete (750 yd3)”

    “A 2 MW wind turbine weighs 1688 tons: 1300 tons concrete, 295 tons steel, 48 tons iron, 24 tons fiberglass, 4 tons copper, .4 tons neodymium, .065 tons dysprosium and more (Guezuraga 2012; USGS 2011).”

    https://www.windpowerengineering.com/take-a-closer-look-at-pouring-turbine-foundations/

    Like

  7. Nemo, After serving many years in the Navy and being crew on two different nuclear subs, I’d rather have a nuke plant in my backyard than a windmill. For once, both heads on my shoulders are in agreement. 🙂

    Like

    1. Silliest, too bad you didn’t meet up with the cojoined twins; one of them is married now.

      Like

  8. Good thing plastic straws were outlawed.

    Like

  9. bird killers–they should be against the law.

    Like

  10. I wonder if the whole wind kit could be fed into a car shredder and the debris used as road bedment?

    Like

  11. Windmill–I wonder what they’re doing with the ones on Osage land? I can’t find any updates other than they have to be completely removed to the tune of $300 million.

    Silliest–I agree.

    crazyeighter–Ha!

    WDS–The hypocrisy is not lost on me.

    avraham–It’s heading that way.

    Robert–I dunno. I think the polymers they use would preclude that.

    Like

  12. I talked to a guy on a crew who was installing windmills. He said that the bases arrived in sections and had been shipped around the world from Vietnam. They are bolted together in progressively narrower sections toward the top. Problem was- they had a huge reject rate because the bases were not true to perpendicular (they were way out of plumb). Too bad everything was subsidized, maybe if it wasn’t we could have found American companies to do the job right the first time. Makes ya wonder just what sort of convoluted back scratching goes on with all of that subsidy money. Stewardship is NOT a term that those who govern us, are interested in defining.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *