(A.K.A. Non-Original Rants)

–Co-opting good stuff from all over the ‘Net and maybe some original thoughts—ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Retracting 'the science'

 Over 300 covid related articles have been retracted so far.  Most of them due to crappy research methods–super small sample sizes or studies that were just amplification of original crappy research.  Some because they didn’t meet the agenda.

Some of the studies that were retracted were because they were fraudulent (remember how the public was told that a medication (hydroxychloroquine) that had been used for years with little to no adverse reactions was harmful and that people were dying from it?).   Need I even mention studies and the FDA referring to ivermectin as horse paste?

Retraction Watch has a list of retracted studies here.  I’ve put a couple below just for shits and grins.   You might find some to be interesting.

Countering fake news in the COVID-19 era: The public’s opinion on the role of an honest and reliable website,” published on November 17, 2020 in Early Human Development; retracted sometime in March, 2021. See our coverage here.

    COVID-19 as an “infodemic” in public health: Critical role of the social media,” published on March 18, 2021 in Frontiers in Public Health; retracted on December 23, 2022.

      Decrease in Hospitalizations for COVID-19 after Mask Mandates in 1083 U.S. Counties,” medRxiv preprint posted on October 23, 2020 and withdrawn on November 4, 2020.

        Anal swab as the potentially optimal specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection to evaluate the hospital discharge of COVID-19 patients,” published on August 14, 2020 in Future Microbiology; retracted on April 13 2021.


        1. Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis,” published on November 22, 2020 in Medical Hypotheses; retracted on or about May 3, 2021. Our coverage here.
        1. Real World Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines against Hospitalizations and Deaths in the United States,” preprint posted on April 23, 2021 in medRxivretracted on August 31, 2021.
        1. Remdesivir Efficacy in COVID-19 Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” published on September 10, 2021 in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneretracted on September 2, 2022.

        1.  

           

           



        1. They are just continuing to muddy the waters so nobody will know what to believe or disbelieve. A part of their plan.

          Like

        2. A treatment that has been around 50 years or more is okay to take.

          Like

        3. “ Most of them due to crappy research”, research they did no research other than to confirm it was deadly

          Like

        4. As much as some people don't want to admit what was done to the world, it did happen no matter how hard they attempt to scrub history. It's important for people to pay attention as it's happening.

          Like

        5. Lot's of funding by the US for crappy research.Will we ever know the total dollars spent for disinformation?Me neither.

          Like

        6. Curiouser and curiouser…

          Like

        7. Dan and Matthew–Agreed. I am even questioning studies that agree with historical scientific knowledge and common sense.Avraham–I'm not a doctor, but definitely concur.Bear Claw–It was less study, more echo chamber.clay–Absolutely agree.Gerry–Nope. Same as we'll never know how much money has gone overseas.NFO–Indeed.

          Like

        8. They are just continuing to muddy the waters so nobody will know what to believe or disbelieve. A part of their plan.

          Like

        9. A treatment that has been around 50 years or more is okay to take.

          Like

        10. “ Most of them due to crappy research”, research they did no research other than to confirm it was deadly

          Like

        11. As much as some people don't want to admit what was done to the world, it did happen no matter how hard they attempt to scrub history. It's important for people to pay attention as it's happening.

          Like

        12. Lot's of funding by the US for crappy research.Will we ever know the total dollars spent for disinformation?Me neither.

          Like

        13. Curiouser and curiouser…

          Like

        14. Dan and Matthew–Agreed. I am even questioning studies that agree with historical scientific knowledge and common sense.Avraham–I'm not a doctor, but definitely concur.Bear Claw–It was less study, more echo chamber.clay–Absolutely agree.Gerry–Nope. Same as we'll never know how much money has gone overseas.NFO–Indeed.

          Like

        Leave a Reply

        Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *